Feminist lesbian couple sues sperm donor to pay child support



Florida: The Florida supreme Court is no new to bizzare and controversial cases hearing.

This time a Feminist Lesbian couple namely Tasha and Jose have sued a sperm donor to pay child support for their baby.

Woman accused man of raping her in dream- Read

They argue that since he's the biological father of their child, he should also pay financial support for it's well being.

Comments

  1. This is just ridiculous, they chose to have a child using a sperm donor (I expect that it from a sperm bank)
    The sperm donor should stay anonymous.!
    It was their choice to bring the child into this world so they should cop the consequences of its welfare......LEAVE THE DONOR ALONE!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wouldn't feel too good if they were a surrogate and they didn't get a choice

      Delete
    2. well no they did not use a spearmbank

      And its the State/city that demands it

      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10595447/Sperm-donor-must-pay-child-support-to-lesbian-couple-court-rules.html

      Delete
    3. That is from the William Marotta case, which is from Kansas, not Florida, and from 2016, and no the final decision by the courts was that he did not have paternal duties

      Delete
  2. R u fucking serious? This is why u ppl r so hated by the public cause ur doing dumb shit like this. If u can't take the heat, get the fuck outta the kitchen.
    What if you started giving birth but you didn't stop and there was nothing you could do how would you feel?
    You should both be ashamed!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read the top of the page.
      The Shit News

      Disclaimer: All the posts are satirical and are not meant to be taken seriously

      Delete
    2. not really satire.....

      https://www.cnn.com/2014/01/23/justice/kansas-sperm-donation/index.html

      Delete
    3. The Kansas case is completely different. There the door is sued by the state.

      Delete
  3. Y'all it's SATIRE which means it's made up and a joke

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not one person read the fist 2 lines of this page. Just more jackasses reading the headline only then running their mouths. Or, in this case, spewing shit from their keyboards.

      Delete
  4. It won't be funny when it actually happens. I never think satire is funny but there is almost always a lot of truth and warning involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it has happened, 2014.. in kansas

      Delete
    2. No. The donor in Kansas was sued by the state, not the couple.

      Delete
    3. Because the couple went to the state for benefits knowing the outcome. That's a standard law in almost every state. That, should the need arise that the custodial parent applies for assistance the non-custodial parent, in this case the donor who was never anonymous, is responsible for both repaying the state and subsequent child support payments. Had the donor been anonymous from the start the state would never been able to push child support upon the donor.

      Delete
  5. What do you mean when ? https://www.cnn.com/2014/01/23/justice/kansas-sperm-donation/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very nice article, I enjoyed reading your post, very nice share, I want to twit this to my followers. Thanks!. คลิปโป๊

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't know if they would get away with it in Florida or not, but you can bet that in California, the state would be in full suport of such an obviously ridicules scam.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hipe that the donor did it via a sperm bank and/or, contract if not. Because, the sperm donor would be liable for support if he did it as a friend etc.,.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is why no one likes them it looks like they were dropped on their heads when they were little and got messed up

    ReplyDelete
  10. Luckily it was overturned in 2016 after the ruling in 2014.
    https://apnews.com/f5a0689f777f44f6ab62935e55c85156?fbclid=IwAR3lawEAHVLiRHDbYlgH-br3CWJpgA_F5RtE-hWPnnt_sXxQ420Boh8b_Iw

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1) the state sued the man, not the women - the state was trying to make parental rights about where the genes came from - the man - and trying to roll back parental rights and take apart family unit
    2) the judge ultimately ruled in favor of the man, saying he did not owe child support

    ReplyDelete
  12. I swear y’all will make up any damn thing. This is the couple, they were named prom king and queen in Tallahassee Fl. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3580615/Lesbian-teens-make-history-sex-couple-prom-king-queen-high-school-Florida.html?ito=social-elitedaily

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's so dumb, they're females not male and female.

      Delete
  13. potangina kaya di tayo umaasenso di kayo marunong magresearch etong buong blog na to shitpost to mga bobo HAHAHAHAHA nakalagay nga diyan sa about the author "shitposting is my coping mechanism" sarap magmigrate p0TA

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog